"Heated Debate" on Magonia

My post below received two comments from people who have their noses out of joint for writing about debunkers.  Who, me, attacking skeptoids? How dare I? It's "cheap and ridiculous" as one wrote. (tres patronizing dahlings!) You all know me over here dahlings and you know I think that's funny, and you also know I will not respond (not directly anyway :) to such remarks. However. The article that I was commenting on in the post below has generated a lot of comments:

Peter Rogerson's review of Whitley Strieber's latest book has stimulated more hits than anything else published on this blog except our obituary of Hilary Evans, and far more comments (17 as I write this, including one from the man himself) than anything else we've published.

So many comments that a new page has been appointed for an on-going debate concerning Strieber. I don't plan on commenting over there, even if such wise and articulate men like Tyler Kokjohn and red pill junkie (The Daily Grail) are. But if you're interested, take a look and maybe join in the discussion.