Chris White Re-bunks: 'Debunking Ancient Aliens Debunked..Debunked. My Response to Philip Coppens'

As I replied to Terry the Censor's comment in the post below, one thing skeptoids are known for is their "rabid terrier like tenacity." That ending paragraphs of White's re-bunking illustrates this pathological wont of the skeptibunkie. Italics are Coppens comments, bold are White's, mine in blue:

Finally, I would like to tackle the section on Ezekiel, but quite frankly, this section was incomprehensible to me. I do not understand what his argument is, apart from the obvious fact we are clearly and obviously wrong.t.

Ok, I have nothing to say if you don’t. ( In other words, as long as Coppens or whoever the object of debunkery is keeps quiet, all is good.)

PS. It is now entirely possible that this reply will be used to create another reply, in the vain hope of trying to elicit from me another reply, so that the debate goes on endlessly, with loads of blablabla. (Coppens is correct of course.) As far as I am concerned, the debate ends here. The very reason why this reply was created, was because people wanted me to reply and hear my opinion on the documentary, so I did. In truth, I feel I have written more than 4100 words that I could have written about far more important topics than Mr. White’s documentary.

I would not have written this if the arguments you put forward didn’t deserve to be addressed. (Ah. Well, there it is.)

Debunking Ancient Aliens Debunked..Debunked. My Response to Philip Coppens | Nowhere To Run with Chris White