tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2780326387798511389.post1076789039621950071..comments2009-03-23T07:58:46.903-07:00Regan Leehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13786586311631698822noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2780326387798511389.post-87344598306804850742009-03-23T07:58:00.000-07:002009-03-23T07:58:00.000-07:00Bogus,<BR/><BR/>Thank you for your comments. <BR/>Your comments would be easier to read -- and might I suggest, taken more seriously by some, if you used paragraphs and punctuation.<BR/><BR/>What I found refreshing about UFO Hunters was the lack of the standard so-called "skeptic." Bill, Ted and Pat don't always agree with each other. I don't always agree with them; for example, I don't share the "time slip" theory. That is very different from inserting an uber-skeptic who clearly doesn't know the first thing about UFOs. How,is that a productive or positive addition to UFO research?<BR/><BR/>One of the biggest misnomers is the idea that anectodal evidence -- "witness testimony" is "garbage." It is not; it's useful and part of the data. It's not <I>proof; </I> but it <I>is evidence. </I><BR/><BR/>The "new guy" does not "see it for what it is and sees reality" he doesn't seem much to care, is clearly rooted to his own beliefs, and holds up any evidence of UFOs (and that includes the ETH) next to his own biases. Again, I refer you to the points I made in my post: his lack of knowledge about anything UFOlogical: his use of "real UFO," his reaction to the triangle witness and lack of sound, etc.<BR/><BR/>I doubt very much Pat liked the new guy, as you insist; his expression told far more than his words did. Moot point however.<BR/><BR/>No doubt many of UFOs are military; no one is arguing that. Each sighting needs to be taken in context -- that includes having a good understanding of UFOs in general including the history of sightings. Cook does not. Nor does he seem to <I>care.</I><BR/><BR/>I find your personal opinions of what we'd be like if aliens were here interesting; what proof or evidence do you have to support such theories? It's possible, of course, but it's all just speculation. Which is fine; we need speculation. <BR/><BR/><I>"and to u whom wrote this article sorry the new guy rained on ur parade where uy would "</I><BR/><BR/>Yes, I am "whom" wrote the article; he barely made a drizzle . . . as to the rest of your sentence: "urparade where uy would" is hard to understand. Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts but please try to present your ideas in a more readable format.Regan Leehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13786586311631698822noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2780326387798511389.post-32534177713846468892009-03-23T05:08:00.000-07:002009-03-23T05:08:00.000-07:00the new guy makes perfect sense / bill needs someone like him around to keep him grounded and in reality. the new guy has scientific background and thats what matters. all this alien this and alien this might be possibke but the evidence is what matters most witness testimony is garbage also. so evidence is the only thing that realy matters in proving something. bill immediately went to talking about proof of time travel when he decided it wasnt aliens the guy is a nut job with a huge imagination. i believe aliens just might exist but bill tries to connect everything to ufos. the4r truth is we probably have the technoilogy people see and mistyake for ufos nowdays.maybe in the 1940's through 1980's wat was seen was extraterrestrial but nowdays there is no telling its probably just us in the sky.the new guy sees it for what it is and sees reality. even pat knows bill is out there and he agrees maybe this guy is needed. pat agrees wit the new guy more then bill if u didnt notice. and to u whom wrote this article sorry the new guy rained on ur parade where uy would l;ike to believe there is anb invasion of aliens. if there was i dont think we would be here today we would probably be enslaved or dead if they were invading earth. i bet one out of every few million sighting might be something special. it is not aneveryday occurance.bogus4me2dayhttp://openid.aol.com/bogus4me2daynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2780326387798511389.post-16907258851207286822009-03-21T07:38:00.000-07:002009-03-21T07:38:00.000-07:00Sadly, they keep screwing around with the show's format, usually a sure sign that a show is in deep trouble. This is the second format change, so I suspect UFO Hunters will fade into memory soon. <BR/><BR/>The weakness in the new format isn't Kevin, it's Bill, who was taking a viewpoint that is, ahem, bat #$#% crazy in order to create some artificial on-camera team conflict. He's the one I vote off the island.purrlgurrlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06519835482606629362noreply@blogger.com